<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Trademarkroom.com Reading Room</title>
        <description>The latest  articles from Trademarkroom.com</description>
        <link></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 15:38:58 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
        <item>
            <title>CONSECUENCIAS DE LA  NO PROTECCION DE MARCAS</title>
            <link>http://www.trademarkroom.com/readingroom/article/consecuencias-de-la--no-proteccion-de-marcas-509785</link>
            <description><![CDATA[The reasons for protecting a trade mark and the negative consequences.]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 15:38:58 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Union Carbide - it's all in a name</title>
            <link>http://www.trademarkroom.com/readingroom/article/union-carbide--its-all-in-a-name-581164</link>
            <description><![CDATA[7 people have recently been convicted of 'negligence' regarding the massive killer gas leak in Bhopal.]]></description>
            <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 21:16:55 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EA Sports sued for trade mark infringement</title>
            <link>http://www.trademarkroom.com/readingroom/article/ea-sports-sued-for-trade-mark-infringement-479068</link>
            <description><![CDATA[Over use of the word 'active']]></description>
            <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 12:19:59 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>DOS EMPRESAS DIFERENTES PUEDEN EXPLOTAR DOS MARCAS</title>
            <link>http://www.trademarkroom.com/readingroom/article/dos-empresas-diferentes-pueden-explotar-dos-marcas-919353</link>
            <description><![CDATA[Fundamentalmente, este texto trata básicamente de una novedad producida recientemente, en el sistema jurídico español, concretamente en la materia relativa al derecho de marcas, relata una sentencia emitida por el Tribunal Supremo, indicando, que ha si]]></description>
            <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 17:11:18 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>VENTJAS DE LA PROTECCIÓN DE UNA MARCA</title>
            <link>http://www.trademarkroom.com/readingroom/article/ventjas-de-la-proteccin-de-una-marca-935295</link>
            <description><![CDATA[Spanish - benefits of protection of a trade mark.]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 09:13:22 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Google Adwords and Trade Marks</title>
            <link>http://www.trademarkroom.com/readingroom/article/google-adwords-and-trade-marks-728825</link>
            <description><![CDATA[This article takes a brief look at the recent ECJ ruling on the use of trade marks in Google Adwords and related advertising or 'sponsored link' services. ]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 11:28:26 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Perfume comparison lists trade mark infringement</title>
            <link>http://www.trademarkroom.com/readingroom/article/perfume-comparison-lists-trade-mark-infringement-602408</link>
            <description><![CDATA[The court of appeal has begrudgingly followed the ECJ's ruling regarding lists of comparable perfumes.]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 10:16:34 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Taxation</title>
            <link>http://www.trademarkroom.com/readingroom/article/taxation-441879</link>
            <description><![CDATA[How much is your trademark worth?]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 09:31:35 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Trademark Infringement</title>
            <link>http://www.trademarkroom.com/readingroom/article/trademark-infringement-715223</link>
            <description><![CDATA[What is trade mark infringement and what are the relevant tests?]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 09:29:30 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Notificar</title>
            <link>http://www.trademarkroom.com/readingroom/article/notificar-874280</link>
            <description><![CDATA[Una marca similar - Si tú  tienes una marca registrada en Reino Unido o en Estados Unidos.]]></description>
            <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 20:26:09 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>First past the post</title>
            <link>http://www.trademarkroom.com/readingroom/article/first-past-the-post-552598</link>
            <description><![CDATA[I own a Trade Mark but How will I know if a similar mark is filed to mine?]]></description>
            <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 09:28:26 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Assigning and Licensing a trade mark</title>
            <link>http://www.trademarkroom.com/readingroom/article/assigning-and-licensing-a-trade-mark-039960</link>
            <description><![CDATA[If you own a trade mark what then? What about a licence or an assignment]]></description>
            <pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 16:20:51 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Why a trade mark needs to be distinctive</title>
            <link>http://www.trademarkroom.com/readingroom/article/why-a-trade-mark-needs-to-be-distinctive-319906</link>
            <description><![CDATA[It seems like a good idea at the time but descriptive marks can often fail]]></description>
            <pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 13:04:58 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>More questions on Google and Transparency</title>
            <link>http://www.trademarkroom.com/readingroom/article/more-questions-on-google-and-transparency-030567</link>
            <description><![CDATA[The adwords cases went one step further to clarification as Justice Arnold delivered his response to the ECJ's reponses to his 10 questions. With one matter outstanding its only a matter of time before its put to bed for now!]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 17:14:58 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Tea Party Trade Mark dispute</title>
            <link>http://www.trademarkroom.com/readingroom/article/tea-party-trade-mark-dispute-467231</link>
            <description><![CDATA[Who owns the rigths to the mark " Tea Party?" A question that is due to be resolved on 6th December 2010 in US District Court West Palm Beach, Florida, USA]]></description>
            <pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 17:06:07 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>All we hear is...</title>
            <link>http://www.trademarkroom.com/readingroom/article/all-we-hear-is-512504</link>
            <description><![CDATA[Music producer sues Lady Gaga, sues music producer...]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 15:14:40 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>US - Tiffany v eBay - the reasons</title>
            <link>http://www.trademarkroom.com/readingroom/article/us--tiffany-v-ebay--the-reasons-908664</link>
            <description><![CDATA[A brief couple of soundbites outlining the reasons]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:37:52 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Ebay and Tiffany in the US</title>
            <link>http://www.trademarkroom.com/readingroom/article/ebay-and-tiffany-in-the-us-104988</link>
            <description><![CDATA[Ebay wins in an American appeal court.]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:16:08 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Google win Vuitton case</title>
            <link>http://www.trademarkroom.com/readingroom/article/google-win-vuitton-case-808266</link>
            <description><![CDATA[After 5 years, Google wins, you win again.  But it's not all good news.  At least not for everyone else.]]></description>
            <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:32:10 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Apple iPad Part 2</title>
            <link>http://www.trademarkroom.com/readingroom/article/the-apple-ipad-part-2-361169</link>
            <description><![CDATA[Apple gets its hands on the US trade mark for iPad, just in time.]]></description>
            <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 13:57:03 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
